An individual's unique assemblage of psychological traits over time
Just like intelligence, there is no consensus
Personality is defined by the particular empiricial concepts which are a part of the theory of personality employed by the observer
Refers to a short-term, ephemeral trait
How do you feel during a test? At the doctor's?
Often the person supplies information about their personality (self-reporting)
May be from diaries or an interview and can elicit very private information
Self-report measures self-concept (e.g. Beck Self-Concept Test)
What are some measurement issues with this?
Lots of measurement issues though!!!
Biased leading to be too generous or severe
May want to rate person as "normal", i.e. in the middle
Something may overshadow (the halo effect)
Context important
Other problems?
May measure thoughts, feelings, behaviors
Can also measure response style (characteristic response pattern independent of the content)
Are they being honest? Are they responding in a socially desirable way? These are validity issues Attempts to measure this on a test - validity scale
Myriad of formats used: traditional test, interviews, performance tasks, etc
They may be structured or unstructured
Most important is a clear definition of the construct of interest!
Now, in the past, in the future
How I see myself, how others see me, etc
Q-sort technique, ranking of variables based on some instruction
"Most how I feel about this course" to "Least how I feel about this course"
Based on Q-factor analysis
Adjective checklist and sentence completion
Range from simple summing of responses to complex algorithms requiring experts
Depends on test makers approach to personality
Is it a nomothetic vs. idiographic approach?
Is scoring normative or ipsative?